Posted on 7 Comments

Town Hall Meeting on Recovery Homes in Frankford

Councilwoman Maria Quinones-Sanchez hosted a town hall style meeting on the topic of recovery houses in Frankford at Sankofa Freedom Academy last Tuesday night.  This was the followup to the meeting held in February of 2009 at St. Joachim.

There was a very good crowd on hand with representatives from both Frankford and Northwood Civic Associations, the Frankford CDC and a large number of residents of Frankford.

Councilwoman Sanchez lead the meeting.  Jorge Santana attended for Representative Tony Payton.  Roland Lamb, the director of Addiction Services, was there.  Doctor Arthur Evans represented the Department of Behavioral Health.  Thomas McDade represented L&I.  Fred Way was there for PMHCC.

All of the experts on the panel made their pitch explaining their function in addressing the problem.  There is no comprehensive legislative approach to solving this problem because, as was pointed out, this problem is really multiple problems manifesting as one.

You have drug treatment providers, good recovery homes,  bad recovery homes, boarding houses and some people that are just plain nuisances.  We have people of good will, ill will and no will.

So where does that leave us?  We as a community have to keep up the pressure.  It doesn’t matter too much to us what the source of the problem is.  The solutions are where we are headed.

  • There are some things that can be done legislatively to limit providers and regulate recovery so that certain standards are maintained.  We have to stand together as a community and demand that those changes be made.
  • We have to stand together with the best of the recovery homes and demand that any others either be brought into compliance or shut down period.
  • We have to demand strict regulation of the drug treatment providers and demand that no others be allowed to set up shop in Frankford.
  • We want to demand that the the Zoning Code Commission add recovery houses and rehabilitation centers to the Zoning Code’s list of Regulated Uses (§
    14-1605); or, at the very least, to the prohibited uses list found in the Frankford Special Services District
    Controls Overlay (§ 14-1623).

Now here is the hard part.  We cannot change the economic forces that made Frankford ripe for exploitation but we can decide to work together to fight them.  Time is on our side.  In ten years, give or take a few, our problem will be how to preserve the neighborhood from becoming another Northern Liberties.  Right now are are waging a holding action until the tide changes in that direction.

Now a word of praise for a guy who does his best to just tell a story.  Toward the end of the meeting questions were taken from the audience.  That is always interesting in Frankford but in this case there were a lot of good questions from very sincere people.  At the end, john Loftus of the Northeast Times stood and said something that kind of hit the mark.  Paraphrasing it, he said there is nobody in this audience who doubts the need for recovery services.  That is not the issue.  The question is why are they all here.  Why should they all be here. Why are they all here, far in excess in proportion to the population.  That is what the community wants to know and there has not yet been a satisfactory answer to that question.

The process is ongoing.  Thanks to Councilwoman Sanchez for having this meeting and pledging to meet with the Frankford Recovery Coalition.  The more parties at the table, the more likely we are to make some progress.  A followup meeting may be scheduled for as early as September.

Read the full story from Northeast Times here.

7 thoughts on “Town Hall Meeting on Recovery Homes in Frankford

  1. You stated: “In ten years, give or take a few, our problem will be how to preserve the neighborhood from becoming another Northern Liberties”.

    What is wrong with Northern Liberties?

  2. To answer John’s question, at least from my point of view, there is no political will to change this situation. Honestly, this problem is hard and I don’t think our political representation has the guts for it. It would mean confronting the recovery programs, speaking out against their establishment in Frankford and making meaningful legislation and regulation to protect the community. I did not go to the last town hall meeting but I’ve been to enough of these events to have lost faith in anyone from the city, elected or otherwise, to make meaningful change here. I always feel like they’ve come to placate us and then do whatever they please.

  3. For Lorraine: I like Northern Liberties because of what has been done to revitalize an older urban neighborhood. Hopefully we can adapt that process to Frankford’s unique style. The only danger in the future development in Frankford is that a lot of us are or will be on fixed incomes. The influx of development will inflate our real estate prices and therefore our taxes. We hope that will be offset by a better quality of life for all.

  4. Frankford can”t even be better than Camden let alone Northern liberties. lol

  5. Our low real estate prices and low taxes are the things that recovery homes, store front churchs on Frankford Ave., section 8 housing, and criminals, find attractive about Frankford. Can you tell me where in Philly a neighborhood has revitalized itself and reduced its crime rate dramatically and still remains a low income, mostly government funded neighborhood?

  6. I’ve lived in Frankford a long time and I’m a 3rd generation Frankford resident. My real estate taxes are low as compared to other more affluent areas of Philly. But what good are low real estate taxes when seniors are afraid to walk in their neighborhood or open their windows in the Spring and Summer? What good are low real estate taxes when you can’t sit on your front porch because your neighbors are blasting their music or smoking pot and using the “F” word as an adjective? What good are low real estate taxes when you home is overrun with roaches and mice because your neighbors are too inconsiderate or too ignorant to keep their home clean?

    If some developer comes along and thinks there is money to be made in revitalizing Frankford and it means I have to struggle to pay my real estate taxes, then I would gladly pay more if it means improving the quality of life here in Frankford.

  7. I am looking forward to the rising value of my property as development happens here. Yes it will increase my real estate taxes. What I don’t need is for those taxes to quadruple. That will put a big dent in our budget. Whether the influx of new folks into the community will bring a better quality of life, let’s hope so.

Comments are closed.